In 2001, Manuel Castells published an instant classic: The Internet Galaxy, Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Re-reading it strikes you full force with the enormity of changes we've seen already, in the few years since 2001.
Here your are, in the age of World of Warcraft and Facebook, reading a text that analyzes role-playing chat environments and The Well as premier instances of social behaviour on the internet. Meet The Flintstones.
However, in other respects, Castells turns out to be a powerful visionary.
networked individualism
The dominant trend in the evolution of social relationships in our societies is the rise of individualism. [ ... ]
After the transition from the predominance of primary relationships (embodied in families and communities)
to secondary relationships (embodied in associations), the new, dominant pattern seems to be built on what could be called tertiary relationships, [ ... ] "personalized communities", embodied in me-centered networks.
It represents the privatization of sociability.
[ ... ]
The new pattern of sociability in our societies is characterized by networked individualism.
Castells, The Information Galaxy, p. 128 (emphasis added)
Here we see the third wave paradigm applied to patterns of social interaction.
no technology push
Castells, true to his background, is keen to point out that this networked individualism results not from psychological preferences, but is
rooted in the material conditions of work and livelihood in our societies.
Nor is this shift in sociability caused by technological developments:
It is not the Internet that creates a pattern of networked individualism, but the
development of the Internet provides an appropriate material support for the diffusion
of networked individualism as the dominant form of sociability.
That is, the web 2.0 buzz was not created by technological innovations; rather
a more fundamental tendency in organizing our social selves, gets expressed
in technology that happens to become available.
Following this reasoning through has rather profound implications.
The big social networking sites aren't really me-centered networks.
They pretend to be, yes, but ultimately these sites are profit-centered
hubs, run by corporations, who cultivate user lock-in.
That's a big gap between fundamental demand and available supply.
There's still plenty of untapped potential for disruptive innovations in
social networking out there...