<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
<channel>
    <title>transcyberia.info - infonomics</title>
    <link>http://transcyberia.info/</link>
    <description>open .:. technology .:. economics</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.2.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    
    

<item>
    <title>the spam arms race</title>
    <link>http://transcyberia.info/archives/2-the-spam-arms-race.html</link>
            <category>email</category>
            <category>infonomics</category>
    
    <comments>http://transcyberia.info/archives/2-the-spam-arms-race.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://transcyberia.info/wfwcomment.php?cid=2</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://transcyberia.info/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=2</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Guido Stevens)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;
The war on spam is mostly waged between spammers and ISP&#039;s, invisible to the public.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://transcyberia.info/archives/1-fighting-spam-with-greylisting.html&quot;&gt;Earlier I wrote about greylisting.&lt;/a&gt;
That&#039;s a fairly minimal change in handling email, that
reduces the spam volume on our mail servers disproportionately.
How can this be? Let&#039;s take a look at the economics involved.
&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://transcyberia.info/archives/2-the-spam-arms-race.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;the spam arms race&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:53:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcyberia.info/archives/2-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license><category>email</category>
<category>externalities</category>
<category>foodforthought</category>
<category>greylisting</category>
<category>infonomics</category>
<category>linux</category>
<category>openbsd</category>
<category>spamfilter</category>

</item>
<item>
    <title>evolutionary economics and open source</title>
    <link>http://transcyberia.info/archives/27-evolutionary-economics-and-open-source.html</link>
            <category>infonomics</category>
    
    <comments>http://transcyberia.info/archives/27-evolutionary-economics-and-open-source.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://transcyberia.info/wfwcomment.php?cid=27</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://transcyberia.info/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=27</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Guido Stevens)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;
In &lt;em&gt;Why most things fail&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulormerod.com&quot;&gt;Paul Ormerod&lt;/a&gt; gleefully attacks
economic orthodoxy. 
Traditional economic theory fails to explain the complexity and dynamics of the real world.
Much more promising is an artificial life approach. Here, unpredictable interactions between simple
agents give rise to complex behavior of the system as a whole.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Creating a simple computer model of a software market in which some firms pursue an open source strategy
turns out to be very instructive, and funny.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;!-- s9ymdb:10 --&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://transcyberia.info/uploads/video/alife.avi&quot; title=&quot;screen video&quot;&gt;&lt;img width=&quot;485&quot; height=&quot;302&quot; style=&quot;border: 
0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;&quot; src=&quot;http://transcyberia.info/uploads/video/alife.png&quot; alt=&quot;screenshot&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
See the group of &lt;code&gt;ooo.......&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; agents up top? That&#039;s the open sourcers, competing with the
closed source &lt;code&gt;xxxxx.........&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; firms.
You can &lt;a href=&quot;http://transcyberia.info/uploads/video/alife.avi&quot; title=&quot;screen video&quot;&gt;click on the image to see an animation&lt;/a&gt;,
or &lt;a href=&quot;http://transcyberia.info/uploads/scripts/alife.py&quot; title=&quot;python script&quot;&gt;download the model&lt;/a&gt; and run your own simulations.
&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://transcyberia.info/archives/27-evolutionary-economics-and-open-source.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;evolutionary economics and open source&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 09:52:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcyberia.info/archives/27-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license><category>artificiallife</category>
<category>complexity</category>
<category>economics</category>
<category>infonomics</category>
<category>innovation</category>
<category>opensource</category>
<category>paulormerod</category>

</item>
<item>
    <title>the economics of free</title>
    <link>http://transcyberia.info/archives/19-the-economics-of-free.html</link>
            <category>infonomics</category>
    
    <comments>http://transcyberia.info/archives/19-the-economics-of-free.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://transcyberia.info/wfwcomment.php?cid=19</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://transcyberia.info/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=19</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Guido Stevens)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Anderson_%28writer%29&quot;&gt;Chris Anderson&lt;/a&gt; is a smart guy, but his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free?currentPage=all&quot;&gt;Wired article on the zero dollar economy&lt;/a&gt; has some major flaws. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Convoluting the &lt;em&gt;fixed&lt;/em&gt; costs of filling a server rack, with the &lt;em&gt;marginal&lt;/em&gt; cost of serving additional customers, with economies of &lt;em&gt;scale&lt;/em&gt;,
is rather confusing. The fact that serving an extra customer is free, does nothing to explain how you&#039;ll reach return on investment and pay for depreciation. Nor does scaling, which does explain a tendency to monopolization, but that isn&#039;t mentioned. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Narrowing externalities down to the non-monetary values of &lt;em&gt;reputation&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;attention&lt;/em&gt; is rather unhelpful. There&#039;s enough monetary externalities that merit attention. Network effects, anyone?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A glaring deficiency is any treatment of transaction costs. It&#039;s &lt;em&gt;transaction costs&lt;/em&gt; diving to zero, far more than &lt;em&gt;marginal costs&lt;/em&gt; diving to zero, that powers the surge in networked business today. The two are highly complementary.
&lt;/ul&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://transcyberia.info/archives/19-the-economics-of-free.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;the economics of free&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:23:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcyberia.info/archives/19-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license><category>chrisanderson</category>
<category>economics</category>
<category>externalities</category>
<category>foodforthought</category>
<category>free</category>
<category>infonomics</category>
<category>transactioncosts</category>
<category>wired</category>
<category>zerodollar</category>

</item>
<item>
    <title>spamonomics - the economics of spam fighting</title>
    <link>http://transcyberia.info/archives/7-spamonomics-the-economics-of-spam-fighting.html</link>
            <category>infonomics</category>
    
    <comments>http://transcyberia.info/archives/7-spamonomics-the-economics-of-spam-fighting.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://transcyberia.info/wfwcomment.php?cid=7</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://transcyberia.info/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=7</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Guido Stevens)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;
Externalities, asymmetric information, game theory, network effects, innovation diffusion:
understanding the countermeasures arrayed against spam, involves a
venerable catalog of analysis tools in the economics of information.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Since this is just a blog post, not a book, I&#039;ll try and keep it 
short and sweet.
&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://transcyberia.info/archives/7-spamonomics-the-economics-of-spam-fighting.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;spamonomics - the economics of spam fighting&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:29:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://transcyberia.info/archives/7-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license><category>asymmetricinformation</category>
<category>economics</category>
<category>email</category>
<category>externalities</category>
<category>gametheory</category>
<category>greylisting</category>
<category>infonomics</category>
<category>innovation</category>
<category>spamfilter</category>
<category>spamonomics</category>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>